Cons Good vs Bad Pros
|
|
Reduces work
|
Increases Work opportunities
|
It encourages bad behavior
|
Encourages people to get their act together
|
Poor people us it to buy drugs &
alcohol
|
Poor people use it to buy the
essentials
|
Teaches that they can expect to be
handed money
|
Teaches them that they need to work for
their own money
|
It can be very easily taken advantage
of
|
It is hardly taken advantage of
|
It’s not effective
|
It is very effective
|
People who have welfare are lazy
|
People who have welfare
|
I am a little mixed with my opinion on this matter. Reagan
was against welfare from the start. He believed that people who had little to
no money were using it for the wrong reasons, one reason being them trying to
use the money to escape poverty. He also believed that they cheated the system
by feeding their drug and alcohol addictions with the money they received each
week. He also stated that he thought these people were too lazy to get up off
their butts, and actually go and try to get a job so they can support
themselves and or their family.
Next, Bill Clinton proposed an act in 1996 called the
(PRWORA) or Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act. He
proposed this act because he also felt that people need to get up off their
butts and go get a job. Clinton thought that this would put an end to welfare. Both
of these guys have similar ideas and yet they are somewhat different.
I agree with these two men. I do believe that there are
certain people out there in this world that have been using welfare for other
reasons. I also believe that people who receive
welfare must take drug and alcohol tests to make sure that they aren’t using
the money they get on those things like drugs and alcohol.